Protocols can be Powerful in Pairs

-
Using NSRF Critical Friends Protocols has made an incredible difference in the schools where I have worked. Whether we have been working through challenging decisions, designing new lessons, or sharing visions for our organization's future, I have been surprised again and again at the implications the protocols have had for our culture and for the students involved. A protocol used during a team meeting can produce some amazing effective and efficient results. However, pulling the whole team together can sometimes be a challenge. This is why I recently began using protocols in meetings much smaller: meetings with one other person.

I have discovered that protocols can be powerful in pairs, as well. Two protocols that I have found especially helpful are the "Data-Analysis" Protocol and the "Student Work Inquiry Rounds" Protocol. Both of these protocols encourage the person sharing the data or the student work to turn away from the group so that its individuals can take turns sharing a variety of observations. When doing this in pairs, the person bringing the data cannot turn away - he or she must participate! - but using the rounds designated by the NSRF protocols can  produce some amazing conversation.

With the Data-Analysis Protocol, I always begin by following the protocol's instruction to allow participants 5-7 minutes to review and take notes on the data that has been presented. We then take turns going back and forth, sharing the following information (in this order):
  • What we see (the "Describing" Round)
  • What we think the data suggests (the "Interpretation Round)
  • What steps or strategies might be beneficial next (the "Implications" Round)
Similarly, with the Student Work Inquiry Rounds Protocol, I also take 5-7 minutes for my partner and I to examine the student work and to take any necessary notes. We then take turns going back and forth, sharing the following information (in this order):
  • What we see (the "Describing" Round)
  • What questions this work raises for us (the "Questioning" Round)
  • What inferences can I make about the work (the "Interpretation Round)
  • What steps or strategies might be beneficial next (the "Implications" Round)
With both of these protocols, the conversations have been terrific and have produced powerful ideas for next steps. As a principal who evaluates teachers, I have been able to use these protocols to have deep and relevant discussion. The protocol has allowed me to keep them from feeling "on the spot," and has given them guidance in regards to how to thoroughly examine data or student work, something many of us struggle to do in a natural, unforced way.

"As a principal who evaluates teachers, I have been able to use these protocols to have deep and relevant discussion."


NSRF also has several protocols that are readily designed for triads (groups of three). For instance, the Speed Consultancy Triads enables groups of three to work through three different dilemmas in less than an hour. In the same way, the Speed Tuning Protocol allows groups to collaborative enhance three documents, lessons, or even units in less than an hour. Participants can also study an article in a group of three or four with the Save the Last Word Text Protocol or analyze successes in a group of three with the Speed Success Analysis Protocol. 

While having the wisdom of a room full of people is certainly powerful, and while many would agree that it is the most effective approach to running any protocol, the ability to pull two or three people together to wrap their minds around a topic is also incredibly beneficial. Imagine being able to invite colleagues to a local coffee shop to constructively talk about data. When there are just two of you, the conversation can easily take place, even if there is a room full of customers standing nearby. Using protocols in pairs or groups of three can build camaraderie and can produce results simultaneously. I hope you will give it a try!

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Build Culture, One "Pin" at a Time

-
This year, our principal came up with a fun way for the administrative team to appreciate teachers. She purchased three different types of "pins" that principals can distribute to faculty or staff. We have pins to give teachers who make notable contributions to our PLC teams and we have pins for adults who go above and beyond for our students. In addition, we have an "apple" pin to give to teachers following a good lesson. We didn't make an official announcement about these pins. We just started distributing them, here and there, in November. As a result, faculty and staff have been pleasantly surprised when we have had something to share, aside from some positive words.  Earlier this month, I put an inordinate amount of time into a presentation. It was the type of presentation that did not require extensive preparation. In short, we had decided that students weren't taking our district writing prompt seriously. The sophomores who had to participate did ...
Read more

Pro-Life Allows 600,000 to become 1 Team

-
One of the great things about going to high school is the opportunity to be part of a team. Whether a student chooses to play a sport or not, he or she has the opportunity to show up and root for the team. When Borgia wins "State," we all win State. Especially at Borgia, team spirit is plentiful.  Sometimes, we have the opportunity to rally around other causes much like we rally around our teams. And in the case of the Pro-Life trip, the team is much bigger than our students experience with the other teams they support. The Pro-Life Trip experience, however, begins with Borgia rallying together as a team. This past fall, our campus minister Andy Halaz put extra energy into helping students to recognize that the Pro-Life trip is an opportunity to come together spiritually. We wanted to fill a bus with Borgia students going to Washington D.C. to march for this worthy cause. We succeeded! This was our first victory as a team.  In doing so, we had to remind students that a trip t...
Read more

The Decision-Making Matrix Helps Us Focus on Rationality

-
A great deal of the CPI Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training focuses on “rationality.” For instance, we acknowledge that a person who is demonstrating “defensive” behaviors is “beginning to lose rationality.” At the same time, we are going to respond more positively to a defensive person if we, as staff members, have “rationally detached.” We are going to more positively influence behavior if we can control our rationality, and that is something that we have the power to do! While Unit 6 helps us recognize “unproductive” responses to defensive and risk behaviors, including “overreacting” and “responding inappropriately,” Unit 7 helps us to think rationally about crisis situations so as to avoid irrational (and unproductive) responses like these. Unit 7 highlights the Decision-Making Matrix, a mental model that places “severity” on a y-axis and “likelihood” on an x-axis, providing an objective way for us to measure risk. And more importantly, the matrix offers us an objective w...
Read more